• That generative AI will advance faster than any technology in human history. Acceleration will come from specialization, better routing, and larger toolchains. Enterprises must plan for constant change.
   

• Effective sub-query augmentation is crucial to optimizing chip utilization and energy efficiency. Fragmentation, retrieval, and tool calls must be policy-controlled. Cost and latency improve when subtasks are targeted.
   

• Consumer AI will trend towards freemium. B2C models will rely on behavioral monetization. Individual users will increasingly need optimal performance and privacy.
   

• As the B2B market becomes ever more crowded with specialists, providers will target narrower tasks with greater precision and control. SEEYOU's orchestration will outperform any single, general model over time.
   

• AI learning from your behavior against your data is a catastrophic singularity. Once exposed, behavioral patterns cannot be retracted.
   

• Prevention must be built into the architecture, not just a policy promise. Not least because laws like FISA 702 and its international equivalents already mandate opportunities for governmental AI eavesdropping. 
   

• The move to run applications from within AI models exponentially increases this risk. Unless queries are fragmented and orchestrated to different models, the providers will see even more of your data, including their full usage, your systemic intent, and intellectual property. 
   

• Ringfencing internal LLMs is an illusion. Users live on the Internet. Models require updates. Monolithic, all-seeing systems create systemic risk.
   

• No one can guarantee that a single LLM will never learn from your data. Inadvertent learning and third-party malintent are real risks. Trust needs boundaries and proofs.
   

• The only true prevention is to ensure no model sees whole queries or user sequences—split and divide inputs. Rotate and isolate the fragments by policy. 

• Internet searches and document retrieval must be physically and logically separated from LLMs. Prevent inference leakage from data collection. 
   

• Data and queries should be encrypted to strong military-grade standards. Token vaults and keys must be isolated. Only the user or enterprise should be able to read PII and sensitive data.

​

• LLM aggregation is high risk. Passing the full context to many models multiplies exposure. Use specialist orchestration with fragment boundaries instead.
   

• Not using LLMs is even riskier. Employees will adopt external tools independently. Shadow use creates uncontrolled leaks.
   

• Vendor lock-in is a significant competitive disadvantage.
  Model quality changes quickly. Diversification and switching matter for capability, cost, and compliance.
   

• Low- and no-risk data can run within your existing SaaS bundles. Sensitive data and complex tasks should use fragmentation, model rotation, and proofs. Route by policy and verify every step.
   

• Our job is to conserve resources safely and enable what would otherwise be impossible. We optimize quality, cost, and latency under governance. We return the best multi-expert coherent answers with traceable compliance.
  ​

• Given that an accelerated Moore’s Law applies to our industry, we commit to doubling effectiveness and user value every 18 months. We will publish progress.
   

• That parts of our technology should remain free. Broad access supports AI-democracy and accelerates learning loops and flywheels to the benefit of all.
   

• That our performance should be verifiable and replicable.
  We will publish methods, acceptance gates, and ship verifier packets so others can rerun our test results.
   

• In open standards, allowing anyone to build high-performance, ultra-safe applications in combination with our foundation-layer generative AI orchestration platform.